The assumption usually made in the insurance literature that risks are
always insurable at the desired level does not hold in the real world
: some risks are not-or are only partially-insurable, while others, su
ch as civil liability or health and workers' injuries, must be fully i
nsured or at least covered for a specific amount. We examine in this p
aper conditions under which a reduction in the constrained level of in
surance for one risk increases the demand of insurance for another ind
ependent risk. We show that it is necessary to sign the fourth derivat
ive of the utility function to obtain an unambiguous spillover effect.
Three different sufficient conditions are derived if the expected val
ue of the exogenous risk is zero. The first condition is that risk ave
rsion be standard-that is, that absolute risk aversion and absolute pr
udence be decreasing. The second condition is that absolute risk avers
ion be decreasing and convex. The third condition is that both the thi
rd and the fourth derivatives of the utility function be negative. If
the expected value of the exogenous risk is positive, a wealth effect
is added to the picture, which goes in the opposite direction if absol
ute risk aversion is decreasing.