We respond to Banks and Johnson's (1994) Comment on Coulter et al. (19
92) drawing on a more general discussion of parametric equivalence sca
le and scale relativity issues and new empirical results. We show that
criticisms of our earlier work are unfounded. When the McClements sca
le is properly characterised, the scale does indeed provide lower esti
mates of poverty and inequality levels than most other scales. We reit
erate our conclusion that relationships between scale relativities and
inequality and poverty indices may be index-specific. Moreover the pi
cture about distributional trends may differ from that about levels.