Indirect (transitive) inference (i.e., if A is related to B, and B is
related to C, then C is related to A) is a ubiquitous component of thi
nking and reasoning. This research demonstrates that a mechanism at le
ast functionally similar to drawing indirect inferences can also be ob
served in unintentional processes of encoding. The 2 studies followed
the same design and used modified versions of procedures tested in pre
vious research on nonconscious information processing (P. Lewicki, T.
Hill, & M. Czyzewska, 1992). In the first learning phase, Ss acquired
an encoding algorithm relating Variables A and B. In the second learni
ng phase, Variable A was removed from the material and replaced with V
ariable C, allowing Ss to acquire the second encoding algorithm (relat
ing B and C). Consistent with the original studies, Ss were not aware
that there were any consistencies in the material. In the testing phas
e material, Variable B was removed, and Ss were asked to make intuitiv
e judgments regarding Variable A. The data from both experiments confi
rmed the expectation that Ss would implicitly draw indirect inferences
(A on the basis of C). This process is discussed as one of the mechan
isms that may trigger the development of various components of procedu
ral knowledge.