The purpose of the study described in this paper is to investigate end
-user understanding of subdivided subject headings in their current fo
rm and in the form proposed by the first recommendation of the Library
of Congress (LC) Subject Subdivisions Conference. The impetus for thi
s study was a charge to the Subcommittee on the Order of LCSH Subdivis
ions by the Subject Analysis Committee of the American Library Associa
tion to respond to the first recommendation of the LC Subject Subdivis
ions Conference that proposed standardizing the order of subject subdi
visions. The authors composed self-administered questionnaires bearing
subdivided subject headings in the ''current'' form and in the form p
roposed in the first recommendation of the LC conference. The authors
recruited end users and professional catalogers to complete questionna
ires that asked for the meaning of individual headings. The authors th
en compared end users' responses to catalogers' responses to determine
end users' level of understanding of subdivided subject headings. An
analysis of end-user interpretations demonstrated that end users inter
preted the meaning of subject headings in the same manner as cataloger
s about 40% of the time for ''current'' forms of subject headings and
about 32% of the time for ''proposed'' forms of subject headings. The
paper concludes with specific recommendations about the first recommen
dation of the LC Subject Subdivisions Conference and general recommend
ations about increasing end-user understanding of subdivided subject h
eadings.