Dj. Hunter et al., NONDIETARY FACTORS AS RISK-FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER, AND AS EFFECT MODIFIERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF FAT INTAKE AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER, CCC. Cancer causes & control, 8(1), 1997, pp. 49-56
To assess more precisely the relative risks associated with establishe
d risk factors for breast cancer, and whether the association between
dietary fat and breast cancer risk varies according to levels of these
risk factors, we pooled primary data from six prospective studies in
North America and Western Europe in which individual estimates of diet
ary fat intake had been obtained by validated food-frequency questionn
aires. Based on information from 322,647 women among whom 4,827 cases
occurred during follow-up: the multivariate-adjusted risk of late mena
rche (age 15 years or more compared with under 12) was 0.72 (95 percen
t confidence interval [CI] = 0.62-0.82); of being postmenopausal was 0
.82 (CI = 0.69-0.97); of high parity (three or more births compared wi
th none) was 0.72 (CI = 0.61-0.86); of late age at first birth (over 3
0 years of age compared with 20 or under) was 1.46 (CI = 1.22-1.75); o
f benign breast disease was 1.53 (CI = 1.41-1.65); of maternal history
of breast cancer was 1.38 (CI = 1.14-1.67); and history of a sister w
ith breast cancer was 1.47 (CI = 1.27-1.70). Greater duration of schoo
ling (more than high-school graduation compared with less than high-sc
hool graduation) was associated significantly with higher risk in age-
adjusted analyses, but was attenuated after controlling for other risk
factors. Total fat intake (adjusted for energy consumption) was not a
ssociated significantly with breast cancer risk in any strata of these
non-dietary risk factors. We observed a marginally significant intera
ction between total fat intake and risk of breast cancer according to
history of benign breast disease, with fat intake being associated non
significantly positively with risk among women with a previous history
of benign breast disease; no other significant interactions were obse
rved. Risks for reproductive factors were similar to those observed in
case-control studies; relative risks for family history of breast can
cer were lower. We found no clear evidence in any subgroups of a major
relation between total energy-adjusted fat intake and breast cancer r
isk.