Vm. Cardenas et al., ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE AND LUNG-CANCER MORTALITY IN THE AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY CANCER PREVENTION STUDY-II, CCC. Cancer causes & control, 8(1), 1997, pp. 57-64
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been classified as a human lung
carcinogen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
based both on the chemical similarity of sidestream and mainstream sm
oke and on slightly higher lung cancer risk in never-smokers whose spo
uses smoke compared with those married to nonsmokers. We evaluated the
relation between ETS and lung cancer prospectively in the US, among 1
14,286 female and 19,549 male never-smokers, married to smokers, compa
red with about 77,000 female and 77,000 male never-smokers whose spous
es did not smoke. Multivariate analyses, based on 247 lung cancer deat
hs, controlled for age, race, diet, and occupation. Dose-response anal
yses were restricted to 92,222 women whose husbands provided complete
information on cigarette smoking and date of marriage. Lung cancer dea
th rates, adjusted for other factors, were 20 percent higher among wom
en whose husbands ever smoked during the current marriage than among t
hose married to never-smokers (relative risk [RR] = 1.2, 95 percent co
nfidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.6). For never-smoking men whose wives s
moked, the RR was 1.1 (CI = 0.6-1.8). Risk among women was similar or
higher when the husband continued to smoke (RR = 1.2, CI = 0.8-1.8), o
r smoked 40 or more cigarettes per day (RR = 1.9, CI = 1.0-3.6), but d
id not increase with years of marriage to a smoker. Most CIs included
the null. Although generally not statistically significant, these resu
lts agree with the EPA summary estimate that spousal smoking increases
lung cancer risk by about 20 percent in never-smoking women. Even lar
ge prospective studies have limited statistical power to measure preci
sely the risk from ETS.