COMPARISON OF CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FETAL KARYOTYPING AT 10-13 WEEKS GESTATION

Citation
K. Nicolaides et al., COMPARISON OF CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FETAL KARYOTYPING AT 10-13 WEEKS GESTATION, Lancet, 344(8920), 1994, pp. 435-439
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
LancetACNP
ISSN journal
01406736
Volume
344
Issue
8920
Year of publication
1994
Pages
435 - 439
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(1994)344:8920<435:COCVSA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
We did a prospective study of women with singleton viable pregnancies at 10-13 weeks' gestation who requested first-trimester fetal karyotyp ing because of advanced maternal age, parental anxiety, or family hist ory of chromosomal abnormality. Women were counselled as to the availa ble options of non-invasive screening or invasive testing by mid-trime ster amniocentesis, early amniocentesis (EA), or chorionic villus samp ling (CVS), or randomisation to EA or CVS at 10-13 weeks. EA was done in 731. patients (493 by choice and 238 by randomisation) and CVS in 5 70 (320 by choice and 250 by randomisation). Both procedures were done by transabdominal ultrasound-guided insertion of a 20-gauge needle. T he rate of successful sampling was the same for both procedures (97.5% ). Spontaneous loss (intrauterine or neonatal death) was significantly higher after EA (total group mean = 5.3%, 95% CI 3.8-7.2; randomised subgroup mean = 5.9%, 3.3-9.7) than after CVS (total group: mean = 2.3 %, 1.2-3.9; randomised subgroup: mean = 1.294, 0.3-3.5), The gestation at delivery and birthweight of the infants after EA and CVS were simi lar. In the EA group the incidence of talipes equinovarus (1.63%), was higher than in the CVS group (0.56%), but this difference was not sig nificant.