IS HISTORY USEFUL IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYME BORRELIOSIS

Citation
E. Hilton et al., IS HISTORY USEFUL IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LYME BORRELIOSIS, Infectious diseases in clinical practice, 3(4), 1994, pp. 277-281
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases",Immunology,"Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
10569103
Volume
3
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
277 - 281
Database
ISI
SICI code
1056-9103(1994)3:4<277:IHUITD>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
We performed a prospective study with 635 adults who presented to a Ly me disease diagnostic and treatment center to determine whether patien t history is helpful in the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Standard as sessment self-report questionnaires were administered, and a detailed physical examination was performed. The patients had serologic testing and if ELISA was positive, a western blot was performed. Patients wer e categorized into four groups: definite Lyme borreliosis, probable, l ow probability, and Lyme borreliosis unlikely. Statistical analyses we re performed to determine if any of the self-reported symptoms had a h igh correlation with a definitive diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. The m ajority of patients did not fulfill clinical and serologic criteria fo r Lyme borreliosis. The results of chi2 analyses comparing frequency o f reported symptoms in the definite and non-Lyme groups indicated that depression, Bell's palsy, and joint pain were the only symptoms that distinguished patients with Lyme borreliosis. Where the disease has a high public profile, reported symptoms of Lyme borreliosis correlated poorly with definite diagnosis.