TRIAL OF INTRAVESICAL VERSUS EXTRAVESICAL URETERONEOCYSTOSTOMY IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

Citation
Rm. Jindal et al., TRIAL OF INTRAVESICAL VERSUS EXTRAVESICAL URETERONEOCYSTOSTOMY IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, Clinical transplantation, 8(4), 1994, pp. 396-398
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
09020063
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
396 - 398
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(1994)8:4<396:TOIVEU>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
We carried out a trial to evaluate the complication rate of intravesic al (LP) versus extravesical (Lich) ureteroneocystostomy in recipients of renal transplantation. Ureteric stenosis was the predominant compli cation in the LP technique, which was more difficult to correct. Compl ications by the Lich technique were urinary leaks, which were managed successfully by prolonged bladder drainage. We conclude that the Lich technique is simpler to perform and avoids the complication of ureteri c stenosis, and should therefore be the procedure of choice for ureter ic implantation in recipients of renal transplants.