Dy. Cheng et al., ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES TO ANGIOTENSIN-IV IN THE PULMONARY VASCULAR BEDOF THE CAT, European journal of pharmacology, 261(1-2), 1994, pp. 223-227
Responses to angiotensin IV were investigated and compared with respon
ses to angiotensin II in the pulmonary vascular bed of the intact-ches
t cat under constant flow conditions. Under low resting tone condition
s, intralobar injections of angiotensin IV caused dose-related increas
es in lobar arterial pressure. Angiotensin II also increased lobar art
erial pressure and was 100 fold more potent than angiotensin IV. Dose-
response curves for both peptides were parallel, and the time-to-peak
increase in lobar arterial pressure in response to angiotensin IV and
angiotensin II was similar whereas the duration of the response to ang
iotensin IV was significantly shorter. Following administration of the
angiotensin receptor subtype 1 (AT(1)) antagonist, DuP 532 (2-n-butyl
-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1- 1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)-methyl]im
idazole), responses to angiotensin IV and angiotensin II were reduced
in a similar manner, whereas pulmonary presser responses to serotonin
were not altered. In contrast to the inhibitory effects of the angiote
nsin AT(1) receptor antagonist, administration of PD 123,319 ((S)-1-[[
4-(dimethyl-amino)-3-methyl-phenyl] henylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H
-imidazol[4,5-c] pyridine-6-carboxylic acid), an angiotensin AT(2) rec
eptor antagonist, did not change responses to angiotensin II and angio
tensin IV. The results of the present study demonstrate that angiotens
in IV has significant vasoconstrictor activity in the pulmonary vascul
ar bed, and suggest that presser responses to angiotensin IV are media
ted by the activation of angiotensin AT(1) receptors. These data indic
ate that angiotensin IV is 100-fold less potent than angiotensin II an
d suggest that the hexapeptide may have a lower apparent affinity for
the angiotensin AT(1) receptor than does angiotensin II in the pulmona
ry vascular bed of the cat.