Aa. Fasanmade et al., BIOEQUIVALENCE OF PYRANTEL PAMOATE DOSAGE FORMS IN HEALTHY-HUMAN SUBJECTS, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition, 15(6), 1994, pp. 527-534
Drugs that are largely restricted to the gastro-intestinal tract (GIT)
for their therapeutic efficacy and that are not substantially absorbe
d into the body are usually inadequately studied in terms of systemic
bioavailability. The possibility of systemic effects requires that bio
availabilities be studied to ensure against enhanced toxicity resultin
g from formulation differences. Pyrantel pamoate falls into this categ
ory. High-performance liquid chromatography was employed in this study
to determine plasma levels of pyrantel in nine healthy human subjects
after administration of tablet and suspension dosage forms. Mean peak
plasma concentrations of 37.56 +/- 9.37, 35.89 +/- 8.94, and 36.22 +/
- 10.10 ng mL(-1) were obtained following administration of 750 mg pyr
antel pamoate in three different formulations. The mean t(max) values
were 2.02 +/- 0.12, 2.05 +/- 0.356, and 2.05 +/- 0.339 h respectively
for the above dosage forms; the respective AUC(0-9), values were 81.01
+/- 12.97, 94.59 +/- 17.18, and 101.47 +/- 19.59 h ng mL(-1). There w
as no statistically significant difference between the bioavailabiliti
es of the dosage forms tested. Large inter-subject variations were obs
erved. One subject experienced abdominal discomfort and one experience
d dizziness. It was not possible to clearly correlate individual varia
tions in absorption with the observed adverse effect because the numbe
r of incidents was low (two out of 27 treatments).