M. Santini et al., INDICATIONS FOR DUAL-CHAMBER (DDD) PACING IN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR PATIENTS, The American journal of cardiology, 78, 1996, pp. 116-117
New technologic development of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
(ICDs) keeps up with the exponential increase of their use for primar
y and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The first-generati
on ICD with limited shock capability alone could be considered adequat
e in most cardiac arrest victims, but it wets not suitable for sudden
death prevention in all high-risk patients with cardiac disease. The s
econd-generation ICD was comprised of hybrid pacemaker-defibrillator s
ystems that provided on-demand ventricular antibradycardia pacing. The
third-generation devices include additional functions, such as antita
chycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia (VT) reversion and low-en
ergy ventricular cardioversion, in addition to ventricular defibrillat
ion and single-chamber ventricular demand pacing. In the near future,
advanced dual-chamber atrioventricular (AV) pacing and defibrillating
systems will also be available. The dual chamber ICD will allow atrial
inhibited/dual-chamber (AAI/DDD) rate-responsive pacing, simultaneous
atrial and ventricular sensing to optimize the arrhythmia identificat
ion, and ICD shock delivery In the proper arrhythmia-related chamber.
Clinical benefits of these devices compared with their cost and comple
xity will require careful evaluation.