Motor program theory has provided physical therapists with one approac
h to understanding how the brain controls movement. Analogous with com
puter programs that specify the operations of computer hardware, motor
programs are thought to contain commands for muscles that allow movem
ents to occur without the need for continuous peripheral feedback. A r
eview of the physical therapy literature reveals many instances in whi
ch motor program theory has been used as a theoretical framework for c
linical practice. Yet despite the contribution programming theory has
made to the advancement of movement science, the motor program constru
ct is currently under considerable threat. Keele's (1968) original def
inition no longer seems tenable, given the problems of program storage
, motor equivalence, movement flexibility, and context-conditioned var
iability. The finding that researchers from different disciplines defi
ne the motor program in a variety of ways adds difficulty to the task
of evaluating the efficacy of the model. A critical appraisal of progr
amming theory and its use in physical therapy suggests that clinicians
need to reconsider the usefulness of the motor program model as a bas
is for movement rehabilitation following brain damage and musculoskele
tal disorders. [Morris ME, Summers JJ, Matyas TA, Iansek R. Current st
atus of the motor program. Phys Ther. 1994;74:738-752.]