A. Hollender et al., SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH VIABLE MALIGNANT NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMOR PERSISTENT AFTER CISPLATIN-BASED INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY, European urology, 31(2), 1997, pp. 141-147
Objectives: Review of the outcome in patients with viable residual pos
tchemotherapy malignant germ cell tumour treated at the Norwegian Radi
um Hospital from 1980 to 1993 and to establish prognostic factors. Met
hods: During the years 1980-1993, about 270 patients with malignant no
n-seminomatous germ cell tumours underwent postchemotherapy surgery at
the Norwegian Radium Hospital. In 27 of these patients, residual viab
le malignant germ cell tumour was found in the operation specimen. The
se patients were scheduled to receive 3 adjuvant cisplatin-based chemo
therapy cycles after surgery, if possible, containing cytostatic agent
s not given during induction chemotherapy. All patients were followed
up until death or January Ist, 1995 (median observation time in surviv
ing patients: 51 months; range: 9-166 months). Results: Sixteen patien
ts developed a relapse after surgery after a median time of 4 weeks (r
ange 1-19 weeks), 12 of them before any adjuvant chemotherapy could be
started. Only 2 of these relapsing patients could be salvaged. At the
last follow-up, 13 patients were alive, and a 43% 5-year survival was
obtained. All deaths occurred within 3 years after surgery. The 9 pat
ients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein and/or human chorionic gonadotro
pin before surgery have a particularly low survival rate(11%), as comp
ared to the 18 patients with normal markers (62%). The most important
prognostic parameter for the postoperative survival was, however, the
initial tumour burden: the 14 patients with initially large or very la
rge tumour volume (MRC criteria) had a 9% 5-year survival, whereas the
percentage was 84% for the 13 patients with small volume disease. Con
clusion: Prognosis is poor in patients in whom residual malignant germ
cell tumour persists in spite of conventional cisplatin-based inducti
on chemotherapy, especially in patients who initially present with lar
ge or very large volume disease and/or pre-operatively elevated tumour
markers. More effective treatment modalities have to be developed for
these patients. The role of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell sup
port should be investigated in future trials, especially in the subgro
up of patients with poor prognosis.