Purpose: To demonstrate feasibility and safely of retroperitoneoscopic
treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, Materials and method
s: II patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction wer
e selected for retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty. Operative rime ranged
between 2 h 30 min and 4 h (mean 3 h 10 min), in 5 cases we had to co
nvert to open surgery and an open pyeloplasty was performed through a
minimal (6 cm) lombotomic incision, Results: Follow-up IVPs were perfo
rmed in all patients approximately 2-3 weeks after stent removal. In a
ll patients, a reduction in the grade of hydronephrosis was observed.
Significant improvement mas noticed in 9 patients; in 2 patients a mod
erate improvement was observed. Conclusions: Our experience with retro
peritoneoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction demons
trates that also with this approach it is possible to perform reconstr
uctive procedures, with minimal complications. Technical refinements w
ill progressively reduce the conversion rate to open surgery, even if
done through minilaparotomy.