EFFECTS OF ETHANOL, MK-801, AND CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE ON LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY IN DIFFERENT RAT LINES - DISSOCIATION OF LOCOMOTOR STIMULATION FROM ETHANOL PREFERENCE
He. Criswell et al., EFFECTS OF ETHANOL, MK-801, AND CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE ON LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY IN DIFFERENT RAT LINES - DISSOCIATION OF LOCOMOTOR STIMULATION FROM ETHANOL PREFERENCE, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 18(4), 1994, pp. 917-923
Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward val
ue of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the
present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulat
es locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethan
ol. A secondary goal was to determine the extent to which the benzodia
zepine-like and NMDA antagonistic action of ethanol accounted for its
effect on locomotor activity. To meet these goals, the effects of vary
ing doses of ethanol (0.125-1.0 g/kg), MK-801 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), and chl
ordiazepoxide (0.3-3 mg/kg) on locomotor activity were studied in seve
ral lines of rats that had been habituated to the testing procedure. T
he effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in the Alcohol-Pre
ferring (P) and Fawn-Hooded rats, which show a strong ethanol preferen
ce, were similar to those of the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP), Flinders
Sensitive Line, and Flinders Resistant Line rats. Only the Flinder Res
istant Line rats showed a small, but significant increase in locomotor
activity after the administration of ethanol. The highest dose of eth
anol (1.0 g/kg) produced locomotor depression in all lines except the
P and NP lines, which were not tested at this dose. These findings do
not support a link between locomotor stimulation by ethanol and ethano
l preference. In contrast, all lines exhibited locomotor stimulation a
fter moderate (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) doses of MK 801, but did not exhibit inc
reases in activity following any dose of chlordiazepoxide. These data
indicate that the profiles of activity after MK 801 and chlordiazepoxi
de were distinct from that of ethanol in the various rat lines. Theref
ore, the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity cannot be accounted
for by reference solely to its antagonist-like action at NMDA receptor
s and/ or its agonist-like action at GABA/benzodiazepine receptors.