Sf. Hurley et al., MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING - MEASUREMENT OF THE COST IN A POPULATION-BASED PROGRAM IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 48(4), 1994, pp. 391-399
Study objectives - To estimate the cost per woman participating in a m
ammographic screening programme, and to describe methods for measuring
costs. Design - Expenditure, resource usage, and throughput were moni
tored over a 12 month period. Unit costs for each phase of the screeni
ng process were estimated and linked with the probabilities of each sc
reening outcome to obtain the cost per woman screened and the cost per
breast cancer detected. Setting - A pilot, population based Australia
n programme offering free two-view mammographic screening. Participant
s - A total of 5986 women aged 50-69 years who lived in the target are
a, were listed on the electoral roll, had no previous breast cancer, a
nd attended the programme. Results - Unit costs for recruitment, scree
ning, and recall mammography were $17.54, $60.04, and $175.54, respect
ively. The costs of clinical assessment for women with subsequent clea
r, benign, malignant (palpable), and malignant (impalpable) diagnoses
were $173.71, $527.29, $436.62, and $567.22, respectively. The cost pe
r woman screened was $117.70, and the cost per breast cancer detected
was $11 550. Conclusions - The cost per woman screened is a key variab
le in assessment of the cost effectiveness of mammographic screening,
and is likely to vary between health care settings. Its measurement is
justified if decisions about health care services are to be based on
cost effectiveness criteria.