BONE-MARROW IMMUNOSCINTIGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONE-SCINTIGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SKELETAL METASTASES IN UROGENITAL MALIGNANCIES

Citation
G. Zoeller et al., BONE-MARROW IMMUNOSCINTIGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BONE-SCINTIGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SKELETAL METASTASES IN UROGENITAL MALIGNANCIES, European urology, 26(2), 1994, pp. 141-144
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03022838
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
141 - 144
Database
ISI
SICI code
0302-2838(1994)26:2<141:BIVCBI>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Bone marrow immunoscintigraphy using a Tc-99m-labelled anti-NCA-95 mon oclonal antibody and conventional bone scintigraphy with Tc-99m-methyl ene-diphosphonate were compared in the diagnosis of skeletal metastase s in 58 patients with urogenital tumours. In 13 patients with metastat ic disease, bone marrow immunoscintigraphy proved to be superior to bo ne scintigraphy, detecting 431 metastatic lesions on immunoscans as co mpared to 261 lesions on bone scans. However, on a patient-by-patient basis bone marrow immunoscintigraphy did not demonstrate a clinical ad vantage over conventional bone scanning, as in this study no patient w as identified with metastatic disease still confined to the marrow spa ce, with bone scintigraphy and bone X-ray being normal.