Ml. Rogers, FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN ASSESSING ADULT LITIGANTS COMPLAINTS OF CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE, Behavioral sciences & the law, 12(3), 1994, pp. 279-298
Based on limited research, clinical and forensic experience and observ
ations, factors hypothesized to be potentially useful in forensic eval
uation of claims of decades-delayed discovery of childhood sexual abus
e are delineated. Factors considered include: (1) alleged victim facto
rs, (2) memory factors, (3) therapist/examiner factors, (4) external i
nfluences on the abuse account, (5) evidential patterns. Differences a
mong a limited sample of cases seen by the author are described. Prese
nt knowledge does not provide a basis for reliable determination of wh
ether a specific recollection is true or false, based only upon the cl
aimant's account. At this time, there is no empirically validated meth
od for discriminating valid from invalid cases. Experts testifying for
either side must exercise caution and restraint as it may be prematur
e and even unethical in many cases to propound opinions about the vali
dity or invalidity of the memories.