Lymphadenectomy has an acknowledged role in the staging of most solid
tumors, however, its therapeutic role remains controversial. To date,
several prospective, randomized, controlled trials comparing either ex
tended vs. conventional lymphadenectomy (in breast cancer) or prophyla
ctic lymphadenectomy vs observation (in No patients with breast cancer
or melanoma) have failed to show survival differences between treatme
nt arms. Gastrointestinal cancers, including gastric cancer, represent
a special case of this general problem in that intra-abdominal nodes
are not clinically accessible and accurate radiographic determination
of nodal involvement continues to be problematic. Without question, st
aging and technical considerations dictate removal of at least some pe
rigastric lymph nodes. However, the one prospective study testing surv
ival benefit for R2 vs R1 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer was negati
ve. This study suffers from small sample size compounded by post opera
tive pathologic upstaging resulting in entry of a moderate percentage
of ineligible patients. Japanese surgeons have also been generally cri
tical of the extent of R2 dissections in Western surgical studies. A s
econd prospective trial, presently underway, addresses these concerns
as well as other concerns about selection bias in older retrospective
studies and should finally resolve the issue of the therapeutic effica
cy of extensive lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.