COMPARISON OF LAURENS, MINGS AND WHO HISTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF GASTRIC-CANCER AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR FOR OPERATED PATIENTS

Citation
M. Cimerman et al., COMPARISON OF LAURENS, MINGS AND WHO HISTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF GASTRIC-CANCER AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR FOR OPERATED PATIENTS, International surgery, 79(1), 1994, pp. 27-32
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00208868
Volume
79
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
27 - 32
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-8868(1994)79:1<27:COLMAW>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The prognostic significance of the above mentioned histological classi fications is evaluated. The survival data of 259 supposedly radically resected patients is analyzed. The survival curves have been calculate d according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Mantel-Co x test. The most important prognostic factors have been found and used in the stratification analysis. The diffuse type of cancer (according to Lauren) has significantly worse prognosis than the intestinal type only considering the same pT (pT3) and sex (male) or age group from 5 0 to 70 years. The infiltrative type of cancer (according to Ming) has a worse prognosis than expansive. The difference is insignificant eve n after stratification analysis. Worse prognosis of diffuse (or infilt rative) cancer is influenced more by the infiltration of regional lymp h nodes than by the depth of infiltration, age or sex. WHO classificat ion is less important as a prognostic factor. Signet ring cell type ca ncer has a worse prognosis considering age group 50-70 years.