The objective of this study was to compare the field and stationary pe
rformance test on mares concerned with their breeding prospects. The d
ata from Hanoverian Warmblood mares, tested in field (n=1724) and on s
tation (n=518) in the years 1987 to 1990, were used for genetic evalua
tion. The heritabilities estimated by using animal-model were ranging
between h2=0.21-0.30 in case of field performance test traits. The sta
tionary performance test traits resulted more fluctuating heritabiliti
es (h2=0.04 to h2=0.70). The genetic correlations between the traits o
f field and stationary performance test were ranging from r(g)=-0.09 t
o r(g)=0.89 and r(g)=-0.70 to r(g)=0.97, respectively. All phenotypic
correlations were positive and ranged at low to medium level in both p
erformance tests. The animal-model was more appropriate than the sire-
model for genetic evaluation. Biasses, due to the subjective scoring s
ystem, are partially compensated by considering the relationship betwe
en all relatives. Field and stationary performance tests lead to an al
most equal ranking of mares. Therefore, both can be used as equivalent
test alternatives in breeding programmes. The field as well as statio
nary performance test of mares can give sufficient evidence for the of
fspring's qualification in competition shows. Out of all traits, trot
and free jumping showed highest association to dressage and jumping co
mpetition, respectively.