THE RELATION OF VASECTOMY TO THE RISK OF CANCER

Citation
L. Rosenberg et al., THE RELATION OF VASECTOMY TO THE RISK OF CANCER, American journal of epidemiology, 140(5), 1994, pp. 431-438
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00029262
Volume
140
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
431 - 438
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(1994)140:5<431:TROVTT>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We previously reported a strong positive association between vasectomy and the risk of prostatic cancer that arose in multiple comparisons m ade within data collected from 1976 to 1988 in an ongoing hospital-bas ed surveillance study of many exposures and diseases. We have reassess ed this association with data collected in the surveillance study duri ng 1988-1992 from a new set of patients (355 cases of prostatic cancer and 2,048 controls with nonmalignant conditions). Because some studie s have reported increased relative risks of lung cancer and testicular cancer in vasectomized men, we also used the surveillance database (4 ,126 men with various cancers, 7,027 men with nonmalignant conditions) to assess the relation of vasectomy to the risk of these and other ca ncers. In the newly collected data, the multivariate relative risk est imate for prostatic cancer in vasectomized men was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-2.7). For lung cancer and testicular cancer, the re lative risk estimates were 1.3 (95% CI 0.8-2.1) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1. 9), respectively; for lung cancer occurring greater than or equal to 1 5 years after vasectomy, the relative risk estimate was 1.9 but it was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.7-5.0). For pancreatic cancer , the relative risk estimate was 1.8 (95% CI 1.0-3.1). For each of the other cancers considered-malignant melanoma, large bowel cancer, blad der cancer, kidney cancer, lymphoma, leukemia, and other cancers-the r elative risk estimate was 1.3 or less and compatible with a value of 1 .0. The present data provide little support for an association of vase ctomy with the risk of prostatic cancer or other cancers. In addition, the data from two sets of cases of prostatic cancer and controls inte rviewed consecutively illustrate that increased relative risks detecte d in screening for statistically significant associations may tend to have an upward bias and to be lower in subsequent data.