Bw. Bottiger et al., BOLUS INJECTION OF THROMBOLYTIC AGENTS DURING CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION FOR MASSIVE PULMONARY-EMBOLISM, Resuscitation, 28(1), 1994, pp. 45-54
Thrombolytic therapy has proved to be efficacious in the treatment of
massive and fulminant pulmonary embolism (PE), but thrombolysis has be
en considered as contraindicated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR). This review on the administration of thrombolytic agents in pat
ients who have suffered massive PE necessitating CPR summarises 14 ane
cdotal reports and three case series involving 34 patients. The case s
eries revealed an overall initial survival rate of 55-100% following b
olus administration of thrombolytic agents. In general, bleeding compl
ications were managed conservatively. The establishment of the diagnos
is may be feasible using echocardiography or bedside angiography durin
g CPR. However, therapeutic measures should be taken without delay; th
e patient's history and the clinical picture may thus be the only diag
nostic criteria. Even where myocardial infarction is misinterpreted as
PE during CPR, bolus injection of a thrombolytic agent can be an appr
opriate therapeutic option. An alternative may be mechanical catheter
fragmentation of the thrombus with subsequent local thrombolysis. Surg
ery may be restricted to hospitals with ready access to extracorporeal
circulation. We conclude that early administration of thrombolytic ag
ents during PE necessitating CPR may help to reduce mortality. We favo
ur the administration of urokinase (2- to 3 000 000-U bolus) or rt-PA.