DOPAMINE D4 RECEPTOR REPEAT - ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT NATIVE AND MUTANTFORMS OF THE HUMAN AND RAT GENES

Citation
V. Asghari et al., DOPAMINE D4 RECEPTOR REPEAT - ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT NATIVE AND MUTANTFORMS OF THE HUMAN AND RAT GENES, Molecular pharmacology, 46(2), 1994, pp. 364-373
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0026895X
Volume
46
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
364 - 373
Database
ISI
SICI code
0026-895X(1994)46:2<364:DDRR-A>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Recent molecular characterization of the human D4 gene has revealed th e existence of various polymorphic forms of this receptor. These varia tions are found in the putative third cytoplasmic loop region and enco de a variable number of repeats of 16 amino acids in length. In the pr esent study we have compared the pharmacological binding profiles of s even different polymorphic variants of the human D4 receptor, the rat D4 receptor, and two different human D4 receptor mutants that were del eted in the repeat sequence. For this purpose we cloned the rat D4 rec eptor gene and compared its gene structure and its pharmacological bin ding profile with those of the D4.4 and D4.7 genes. The rat and human D4 genes display a high degree of sequence similarity, especially in t he coding regions. An Alu repeat sequence was identified in the first intron of the human D4 gene but is not present in the rat D4 gene. Fur thermore, using the polymerase chain reaction we cloned 3-, 5-, 6-, an d 9-fold repeat sequences. These cloned repeat sequences were used for the reconstruction of full length cDNAs encoding D4.3, D4.5, D4.6, an d D4.9, respectively. These novel forms of the human D4 receptor, as w ell as the previously cloned D4.2, D4.4, and D4.7 forms, were transien tly expressed in COS-7 cells. All of the different forms of the human and rat D4 receptors and repeat deletion mutants displayed similar bin ding profiles for all ligands tested, although small differences were observed. The affinity for dopamine could be decreased by guanosine-5' -(beta,gamma-imido)triphosphate with the different forms of the D4 rec eptor, including the two receptor mutants that were deleted in the rep eat sequence. These data suggest that the polymorphic repeat sequence has little influence on D4 binding profiles and might not be essential for G protein interaction.