A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF 4 HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS

Citation
Bg. Ortmeier et al., A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF 4 HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS, Clinical therapeutics, 16(4), 1994, pp. 707-713
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
01492918
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
707 - 713
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(1994)16:4<707:ACO4HC>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a cost-benefit analysis conducted f or pregnancy prevention treatment with four hormonal methods of contra ception using a managed-care viewpoint. The therapies analyzed are med roxy-progesterone acetate injection (Depo-Provera(R)), levonorgestrel subdermal implants (Norplant(R)), progestogen-only oral tablets (Nor-Q D(R)), and combination progestogen/estrogen oral tablets (Ortho-Novum( R) 7/7/7). Cost and benefits associated with the use of therapies are identified and analyzed based on the cost per patient-day of effective pregnancy prevention. The analysis demonstrates that all four methods have a positive net benefit, with Depo-Provera having the highest net benefit. This information can provide decision makers within a pharma cy and therapeutics committee of a managed-care organization the frame work on which to base formulary decisions.