Lg. Heaney et al., ELECTRONIC CELL COUNTING TO MEASURE TOTAL CELL NUMBERS IN BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUID, The European respiratory journal, 7(8), 1994, pp. 1527-1531
Cell counting of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is performed manua
lly in routine practice. This has both methodological and inherent err
ors; however, the accuracy and suitability of automated counting devic
es have been questioned. In this study, a Coulter(R) Counter D Industr
ial model was calibrated and then used to measure the total cell count
in unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and compared to a standa
rd manual method. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed on 34 patients
undergoing routine bronchoscopy. An aliquot of unprocessed bronchoalve
olar lavage fluid was taken for all counting procedures. Manual counts
were performed blind by two experienced independent observers using i
mproved Neubauer chambers. Electronic counting measured 1 ml aliquots
suspended in 10 and 20 ml Isoton(R) counting 0.5 and 1 ml duplicates.
The correlation coefficients between electronic and manual counts were
good. The coefficients of repeatability of electronic counts, for rep
eat counts, both on the same dilution Intra-Coulter(R): 0.1x10(5) cell
s.ml(-1) and different dilutions (Interdilution-Coulter(R): 0.48x10(5)
cells ml(-1)), were superior compared to those for repeat manual coun
ts by the same observer (1.03x10(5) cells.ml(-1)), and counts between
observers (1.82x10(5) cells.ml(-1)). This method offers a quick, preci
se and simple method for counting cells in unprocessed bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid, which is both less labour intensive and subjective than
manual counting.