This paper describes an experimental study of four different absorber
designs in this type of system: cross-current and counter-current pack
ed-bed absorbers, the spray absorber and fluid-bed absorber. In a labo
ratory pilot, plant, working lines for the absorbers were determined u
nder adiabatic conditions. The influences of internal solution flow, g
as flow, pressure drop and dissipation are discussed. The working line
s represent the efficiency for each absorber. The highest performance
occurs with the packed-bed absorbers, followed by the fluid-bed absorb
er and finally the spray absorber. For open absorption systems in air-
conditioning applications (small scale), the cross-current absorber is
preferable, and for industrial utilization (large scale) the fluid-be
d absorber should be chosen.