Sm. Pellis et Vc. Pellis, DEVELOPMENT OF RIGHTING WHEN FALLING FROM A BIPEDAL STANDING POSTURE - EVIDENCE FOR THE DISSOCIATION OF DYNAMIC AND STATIC RIGHTING REFLEXES IN RATS, Physiology & behavior, 56(4), 1994, pp. 659-663
Righting to prone when placed supine on the ground by rats is present
at birth, albeit in incomplete form. In contrast, righting in the air
when falling from the supine position does not begin to emerge until t
he end of the first week and is nor, complete until the end of the thi
rd week postnatally. On the ground, the animals have sensory informati
on from proprioceptive-tactile sources, as well as vestibular; in the
air, they have only vestibular. Thus, it is possible that the differen
ce between contact righting and air righting is a reflection of the re
lative difference in the maturation of tactile vs. vestibular mechanis
ms. In this study, pups were tested by pushing them backwards from a b
ipedal standing position. Such a concert provided proprioceptive-tacti
le information during the fall. The results showed that the developmen
tal onset and maturation of righting from the bipedal position resembl
ed that of air righting rather than contact righting. This suggests th
at the difference between air righting and contact righting is not due
to differences in sensory inputs, but to differential maturation of n
eural mechanisms for acceleratory (i.e., falling) vs. stationary (i.e.
, lying on the ground) forms of righting. That is, the appropriate neu
ral systems are organized for the type of righting, not for the sensor
y systems used. Even so, some evidence is provided suggesting a develo
pmental dissociation between righting from falling with vestibular inf
ormation only, and with proprioceptive-tactile information in addition
. Therefore, righting systems appear to need two dimensions of classif
ication-one based on sensory systems involved, and the other in terms
of the context of righting (i.e., falling vs. stationary).