K. Engin et al., MULTIPLE FIELD HYPERTHERMIA COMBINED WITH RADIOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED-CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST, International journal of hyperthermia, 10(5), 1994, pp. 587-603
Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the b
reast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hypert
hermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objectiv
e of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and co
mplications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping f
ields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 290
0 cm(2) with or without multiple nodules less than or equal to 3 cm de
ep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing
previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia app
licator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz m
icrowaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia appli
cator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a par
ticular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the
entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields t
o a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 a
nd 50 Gy. The equivalent total dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the line
ar-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hype
rthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days.
Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tu
mour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min
. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation
therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once.
Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator f
ields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treat
ments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (rang
e of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The t
umour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nev
ertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was
only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemi
c tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patien
ts. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermo
radiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial
mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal
damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hype
rthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcin
oma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the ches
t wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork the
rmoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermi
a fields.