J. Vanrijn et al., TIME-TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS FOR STEP-DOWN HEATING IN NORMAL AND THERMOTOLERANT CELLS, International journal of hyperthermia, 10(5), 1994, pp. 643-652
Normal and thermotolerant H35 cells were submitted to step-down heatin
g (SDH). SDH can significantly reduce the induction and expression of
thermotolerance. For SDH a sensitizing treatment (ST) at 44.6 degrees
C was followed by a test treatment (TT) at a lower hyperthermic temper
ature. The comparison between the thermotolerant and non-thermotoleran
t condition was based on isosurvival ST doses. For both conditions dos
e-effect relationships were obtained by plotting the ST-surviving frac
tion against the D-0 of a TT. The TT was at either 41 or 42.5 degrees
C, representing respectively, a permissive or a non-permissive conditi
on for chronic induction of thermotolerance (CIT). The complex dose-ef
fect relationships are partly exponential. In non-thermotolerant cells
tested at 42.5 degrees C the dose-effect relationship between ST and
TT is relatively weak. At 41 degrees C, however, the expression of CIT
is strongly inhibited after a ST that kills <20% of the cells. At hig
her ST doses the response is comparable with that at 42.5 degrees C. I
n thermotolerant cells a high degree of thermosensitization is also ob
served for relatively low ST doses, but in contrast with non-thermotol
erant cells a stronger dose-effect relationship remains at the higher
ST doses. Ultimately this results in a comparatively higher degree of
thermosensitization that can be achieved in non-thermotolerant cells.
For example, at an isosurviving fraction of 0.15 the reduction of D-0
in non-thermotolerant cells at 42.5 degrees C is less than five times,
whereas in thermotolerant cells, the D-0 reduction is between 40 and
50 times. A similar reduction is found in non-thermotolerant cells tes
ted at 41 degrees C. Subsequently, an isosurvival ST dose of about 40%
was used in combination with a TT that was varied between 39 and 44 d
egrees C. D-0's were plotted in an Arrhenius diagram to obtain a time-
temperature relationship for the effect of SDH on thermotolerant and n
on-thermotolerant cells. The four plots are all biphasic with a downwa
rd inflection. Thermotolerance causes an upward shift of the inflectio
n point of 2 degrees C relative to single-heated cells, whereas SDH ca
uses a downward shift of 1 degrees C in single-heated cells and of 2 d
egrees C in thermotolerant cells. For most of the temperature range, i
.e. 39-43.5 degrees C, SDH decreases the activation energies.