Ta. Salthouse et Ve. Coon, INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENTIAL DEFICITS - THE CASE OF AGING AND MENTAL ARITHMETIC, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 20(5), 1994, pp. 1172-1182
A fundamental issue in research on individual differences is the type
of evidence sufficient to justify an inference of selective or distinc
t deficits in relevant theoretical processes. It is proposed that an i
mportant consideration is the extent to which the individual differenc
es in 1 variable are independent of those in another variable. Specifi
cally, the suggestion presented here is that a strong conclusion of se
lective impairment requires evidence that there is significant group-r
elated variance in 1 variable after the variance in the other relevant
variable is controlled. Furthermore, an inference that the groups are
equivalent on a particular theoretical process requires evidence that
the variable presumed to reflect that process has sufficient unique v
ariance to justify the claim that a distinct process is being assessed
. The proposed methods are illustrated with two studies comparing adul
ts of different ages in mental arithmetic tasks.