2 basic frameworks for lexical principles have been proposed (Golinkof
f, Mervis, & Hirsh-Pasek; Markman). In many types of situations, these
frameworks make the same predictions regarding 2-year-olds' interpret
ation of novel terms. However, the predictions diverge in some cases.
3 experiments were conducted to address 1 such situation: the case in
which the child hears a novel term but already knows a label for each
of the objects present. Results of all 3 studies converged on the same
outcome: The new term was most likely to be treated as a second basic
-level name for the category to which the object belonged. Analyses of
individual patterns of responding revealed that, of the 58 subjects,
50 made more basic-level responses than part responses, 1 made equal n
umbers of basic-level and part responses, and 7 made more part respons
es than basic-level responses. Implications of these findings for mode
ls of early lexical development are discussed.