D. Huntley et al., NONAQUEOUS PHASE HYDROCARBON IN A FINE-GRAINED SANDSTONE .2. EFFECT OF LOCAL SEDIMENT VARIABILITY ON THE ESTIMATION OF HYDROCARBON VOLUMES, Ground water, 32(5), 1994, pp. 778-783
The exaggeration of light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPL), typically
hydrocarbon, by monitoring wells is a well-known problem that introduc
es significant errors in the estimation of recoverable hydrocarbon. Fa
rr et al. (1990) and Lenhard and Parker (1990) show that significantly
different volumes of hydrocarbon may produce the same thickness of hy
drocarbon in a monitoring well, due to differences in the capillary ch
aracteristics between soil types. The purpose of our investigation was
to evaluate the influence of local sediment variability on estimation
of hydrocarbon volumes. Sediment samples from two sites underlain by
a relatively homogeneous sandy deposit were collected within a small a
rea. Capillary characteristic curves were determined for 10 samples fr
om one site and 41 samples from the second site using a pressure plate
. Grain-size analysis was performed on all samples for which pressure
plate data were available.The results show significant variability, ev
en for small sites. For example, a hydrocarbon volume of three cm(3)/c
m(2) could produce anywhere between 45 and 200 cm of hydrocarbon withi
n an observation well. This suggests that use of an ''average'' soil s
ample to characterize hydrocarbon exaggeration, within even a very sma
ll site, can lead to substantial errors. It also suggests that maps of
apparent hydrocarbon thickness can be extremely misleading, leading h
ydrologists to place remediation wells in areas of greatly exaggerated
thicknesses produced by fine-grained materials. Comparison between ch
aracteristic curves calculated from grain-size analysis using the appr
oach of Mishra et al. (1989) to those measured using the pressure plat
e shows poor correlation that introduces large errors into the estimat
ed hydrocarbon volumes.