THE ROLE OF THE PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIAN IN THE CARE OF CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS HEART-DISEASE

Citation
Pc. Young et al., THE ROLE OF THE PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIAN IN THE CARE OF CHILDREN WITH SERIOUS HEART-DISEASE, Pediatrics, 94(3), 1994, pp. 284-290
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00314005
Volume
94
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
284 - 290
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(1994)94:3<284:TROTPP>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objective. To determine the roles of primary care physicians and speci alists in the medical care of children with serious heart disease. Set ting. Pediatric Cardiology Division; Tertiary Care Children's Hospital . Subjects. Convenience sample of parents, primary care physicians, an d pediatric cardiologists of 92 children with serious heart disease. D esign. Questionnaire study; questionnaires based on 16 medical care ne eds, encompassing basic primary care services, care specific to the ch ild's heart disease and general issues related to chronic illness. Res ults. All children had a primary care physician (PCP), and both they a nd the parents (P) reported high utilization of PCP for basic primary care services. However, there was little involvement of PCP in providi ng care for virtually any aspect of the child's heart disease. Parents expressed a low level of confidence in the ability of PCP in general or their child's own PCP to meet many of their child's medical care ne eds. Both PCP and pediatric cardiologists (PC) were significantly more likely than parents to see a role for PCP in providing for care speci fic to the heart disease as well as more general issues related to chr onic illness. PC and PCP generally agreed about the role PCP should pl ay, although PC saw a bigger role for PCP in providing advice about th e child's activity than PCP themselves did. PC were less likely to see the PCP as able to follow the child for long term complications than PCP did. PC were more likely than PCP to believe that PCP were too bus y or were inadequately reimbursed to care for children with serious he art disease. Only about one-third of parents reported discussing psych osocial, family, economic, or genetic issues with any provider, and PC P were rarely involved in these aspects of chronic illness. Conclusion s. Primary care physicians do not take an active role in managing eith er the condition-specific or the more general aspects of this serious chronic childhood illness. With appropriate information and support fr om their specialist colleagues primary care physicians could provide m uch of the care for this group of children. Generalists and specialist s are both responsible for educating and influencing parents about the role primary care physicians can play in caring for children with ser ious chronic illness.