The present paper intends to clear the way to considering all psychopa
thology as responses to failures in the human environment by examining
three common sources of error in scientific reasoning about psychopat
hology: (i) the false identification of ''biological considerations''
with the sub-interest of organic pathology, (ii) the idea that a perso
n could be genetically predisposed or vulnerable to psychopathology, (
iii) the failure to distinguish between causal forms of explanation an
d explanation based upon connections of meaning and significance. For
convenience, the omnibus term ''environmental failure-oppression'' (EF
O) is introduced to refer to the totality of possible failures in the
human environment.