This study uses unpublished EEOC data from 1979-89 to concentrate on h
ow dwindling resources and policy changes advocated by the EEOC chairs
regarding the time and intensity devoted to anti-discrimination cases
may have yielded regional variation in discrimination outcomes. We ar
rive at two major conclusions. First, evidence here suggests that the
EEOC counteracted potential regional resistance against anti-discrimin
ation laws. Second, we argue that the seeming inefficiency of the EEOC
during Thomas' first years as EEOC chair appears to have occurred bec
ause he inherited a large pool of low-merit cases.