An ongoing and controversial topic of congressional scholars is the qu
estion ''Are committees 'preference outliers' vis-a-vis their parent c
hamber?'' Despite numerous research efforts showing isolated cases of
outlying committees, little evidence shows a systematic tendency for c
ommittees to be unrepresentative of their legislature. A paper which c
omes close to being an exception is Weingast and Marshall's (1988) ana
lysis of ''the industrial organization of Congress,'' which reports ev
idence of many and very strongly outlying committees. However, the app
arently strong evidence is due more to the authors' incorrectly execut
ed methods than to a general tendency for committees to be outliers. I
n this note I review the state of the committee-outlier debate and als
o show that Weingast and Marshall's empirical results cannot be replic
ated. I accordingly provide the correct results once their statistical
tests are properly executed.