The paper contends the main virtue conventionally attributed to propor
tional electoral rules (i.e., effective representation of political vi
ews). It discusses a number of shortcomings that lead too much proport
ionality to a self-defeat: it reduces vote mobility through the strong
cultivation of voters' loyalties; it smooths out vote variations when
transforming them into seat variations; it reinforces intraparty ties
to the detriment of vertical attention to constituents and it impinge
s on the working of checks-and-balances. The paper does not aim at a s
ystematic evaluation of the properties of various voting systems, nor
is it the proportional principle as such that is under attack. However
, its combination with other institutional features can entrap voters
in their own choices, thus nurturing political collusion. It is becaus
e of the ensuing lower influence of the voters on political decision-m
aking that too much proportionality can lead to poor representation.