Several simplified calculation methods have been developed for structu
ral fire design. Their function is to bridge the gap between element c
lassification according to design tables, which are often too coarse f
or practical work, and elaborate scientific computer codes, which rema
in inaccessible for normal users. The aim of this paper is to compare
and evaluate existing analytical methods for fire design of structural
elements made of reinforced concrete, structural steel or timber. The
fundamentals of these methods are outlined and discussed with regard
to fire load, thermal and mechanical high-temperature behaviour of the
materials, thermal and mechanical analysis of cross-sections and stru
ctures, and safety concept. The existing methods are valuated taking i
nto account different criteria, e.g. consistency, theoretical and expe
rimental verification and applicability of the procedure and input dat
a. The overall uncertainties and deviations from existing test results
are determined and covered by a global safety margin.