Jh. Anderson et al., CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETIC ADVANTAGES OF NEW DRUG-DELIVERY METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LIVER-TUMORS, Clinical pharmacokinetics, 27(3), 1994, pp. 191-201
Response rates following systemic chemotherapy for hepatic tumours are
disappointing. The drugs used have a narrow therapeutic ratio, which
limit the scope for dose escalation of these potentially toxic agents.
Therefore, alternative delivery methods that optimise the efficacy of
currently available cytotoxic agents have been explored. Several nove
l approaches have attempted to 'target' treatment so that it reaches t
he tumour whilst minimising systemic exposure. There is some evidence
to sug gest that certain agents, including monoclonal antibodies and l
iposomes, selectively lodge in tumours following intravenous administr
ation. Alternatively, the route of administration may be modified to e
nhance targeting of the administered drug. Delivery via the hepatic ar
terial, portal venous, and peritoneal routes as well as drug delivery
via direct implantation may provide certain pharmacokinetic advantages
. Infusion rates may be adjusted to optimise the pharmacokinetic profi
le. Chemoembolisation with microspheres, microcapsules or macromolecul
es might enhance targeting further. Variations in particle characteris
tics or by modifying hepatic arterial blood flow with vasoactive subst
ances may be used to further refine this technique. The ultimate 'magi
c bullet', which allows total delivery of treatment to malignant cells
whilst eliminating exposure of healthy tissues to these toxic agents,
has not been developed as yet. However, currently available technique
s allow considerable dose escalation that, whilst not providing a sign
ificant survival advantage, certainly improves response rates.