D. Harari et al., CONSTIPATION - ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT IN AN INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERLY POPULATION, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42(9), 1994, pp. 947-952
OBJECTIVES: To examine prescribing and utilization patterns of laxativ
es, stool softeners, and enemas in a large, long-term care facility, t
o compare self-reports of constipation with specific, bowel-related sy
mptoms in residents of this facility, and to examine concordance betwe
en bowel symptoms reported:by residents and the assessments of the nur
sing staff. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: All i
ndividuals residing in an academically oriented long-term care facilit
y in the United States for at least 1 month (n = 694). MEASUREMENTS: C
linical, functional, and medication data were abstracted from the medi
cal and nursing records. Individual interviews regarding bowel-related
symptoms were conducted with all able participants (n = 456 (66%)) an
d their respective primary nurses, and concordance was determined. The
study definition of symptom-specific constipation was no more than 2
bowel movements per week and/or straining on more than 1 in 4 bowel mo
vements. RESULTS: Fifty percent (n = 367) of all residents used at lea
st 1 daily laxative, stool softener or enema during a 1-month study pe
riod. Over half of all laxative users (it = 200) took more than 60 dos
es per month. Stool softeners were most commonly prescribed, followed
by saline laxatives, stimulant laxatives, hyperosmolar laxatives, and
bulk laxatives. Forty-seven percent (n = 213) of the 456 interview res
ponders reported constipation (''self-reporters''), but only 62% of se
lf-reporters met the study criteria for symptom-specific constipation.
Concordance between resident's and nurse's report regarding specific
bowel symptoms was only fair to slight (kappa 0.12-0.38). Self-reporte
rs of constipation took almost twice as many laxatives, stool softener
s, and enemas as residents who did not report constipation. CONCLUSION
: Our findings emphasize the need for a more systematic approach to th
e assessment of constipation in the long-term care setting, particular
ly when pharmacologic treatment is being considered.