This paper hypothesizes that, when their products are imperfect substi
tutes, firms can promote collusion by cross-licensing their competing
patents. Cross-licensing is shown to enhance the degree of collusion a
chieved in a repeated game by credibly introducing the threat of incre
ased rivalry in the market for each firm's product. The paper then exa
mines the consistency of the theory developed with the available evide
nce. Anti-trust implications of the practice of cross-licensing of com
peting patents are discussed.