We are now seeing a new wave of literature about the ''crisis'' of the
welfare state. In the earlier wave, some critics charged that social
spending significantly detracted from macro- or microeconomic performa
nce, while others challenged the legitimacy or efficacy of welfare pro
grams; a third group worried about the effect of macroeconomic problem
s on the viability of the welfare state. None of these criticisms can
be said to have been satisfactory, and continued reiterations of them
betray a lack of cross-national perspective and a priori reasoning abo
ut empirical matters. Works with greater historical depth and more rec
ent studies constitute a much-needed reaction against the ''crisis'' l
iterature.