Marvin Olasky argues that compassion once meant a reciprocal relations
hip between those who provided charity and those who received it. This
complex relationship has been undermined by the state's monopoly of w
elfare, which, in the name of compassion, eliminates people's sense of
compassion. Olasky's insistence that private and public actions be an
alyzed in isolation from each other is unrealistic. The real question
is what works and what doesn't. Americans need a way to use government
to strengthen private institutions such as the family. Then we can fi
nd solutions to welfare problems that respond to practical, not moral
and theological, concerns.