Rw. Allan et Hp. Zeigler, AUTOSHAPING THE PIGEONS GAPE RESPONSE - ACQUISITION AND TOPOGRAPHY ASA FUNCTION OF REINFORCER TYPE AND MAGNITUDE, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 62(2), 1994, pp. 201-223
The pigeon's key-pecking response is experimentally dissociable into t
ransport (head movement) and gape (jaw movement) components. During co
nditioning of the key-pecking response, both components come under the
control of the conditioned stimulus. To study the acquisition of gape
conditioned responses and to clarify the contribution of unconditione
d stimulus (reinforcer) variables to the form of the response, gape an
d key-contact responses were recorded during an autoshaping procedure
and reinforcer properties were systematically varied. One group of 8 p
igeons was food deprived and subgroups of 2 birds each were exposed to
four different pellet sizes as reinforcers, each reinforcer signaled
by a keylight conditioned stimulus. A second group was water deprived
and received water reinforcers paired with the conditioned stimulus. W
ater- or food-deprived control groups received appropriate water or fo
od reinforcers that were randomly delivered with respect to the keylig
ht stimulus. Acquisition of the conditioned gape response frequently p
receded key-contact responses, and gape conditioned responses were gen
erally elicited al higher rates than were key contacts. The form of th
e conditioned gape was similar to, but not identical with, the form of
the unconditioned gape. The gape component is a critical topographica
l feature of the conditioned key peck, a sensitive measure of conditio
ning during autoshaping, and an important source of the observed simil
arities in the form of conditioned and consummatory responses.