NIFEDIPINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN FACILITATING URETERAL STONE PASSAGE - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY

Citation
L. Borghi et al., NIFEDIPINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN FACILITATING URETERAL STONE PASSAGE - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY, The Journal of urology, 152(4), 1994, pp. 1095-1098
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
152
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1095 - 1098
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1994)152:4<1095:NAMIFU>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Expulsive medical therapy of ureteral stones is not well established. To test the efficacy of a calcium antagonist (nifedipine) associated w ith a corticosteroid (methylprednisolone) in facilitating ureteral sto ne passage, we studied 86 patients with a unilateral ureteral radiopaq ue stone not larger than 15 mm. in maximum diameter, confirmed in each case by drop excretory urography. Patients were randomly treated for a maximum of 45 days under double-blind conditions with 16 mg. methylp rednisolone plus 40 mg. nifedipine daily (group 1-13 women and 30 men, mean age 45 +/- 14 years, standard deviation) and with 16 mg. methylp rednisolone plus placebo daily (group 2-18 women and 25 men, mean age 43 +/- 14 years). All patients also received 2 l. of low mineral conte nt water daily. The average maximum diameter of the stones was 6.7 +/- 3.0 mm. in group 1 and 6.8 +/- 2.9 mm. in group 2 (not significant). Partial ureteral obstruction was present in approximately half of the patients in both groups. Four patients in group 1 and 6 in group 2 dro pped out of the study. In group 1, 34 patients had successful results (stone passage without surgical manipulation) and 5 failed (success ra te 87%), compared to 24 and 13, respectively, in group 2 (success rate 65%). This difference was significant (p = 0.021, Fisher's exact test ). No difference was present in the maximum stone diameter among the s uccessful cases in groups 1 and 2 (6.4 +/- 2.8 and 5.3 +/- 2.2 mm., re spectively, not significant). In both groups the maximum diameter of t he stone was larger in the failed than in the successful cases (group 1-10.4 +/- 3.0 versus 6.4 +/- 2.8 mm., p = 0.005, and group 2-9.3 +/- 2.5 versus 5.3 +/- 2.2 mm., p = 0.0001). In group 1 the mean interval for stone passage in the successful cases was 11.2 +/- 7.5 days, compa red to 16.4 +/- 11.0 days in group 2 (p 0.036, Student's t test). We c onclude that nifedipine associated with methylprednisolone is effectiv e in facilitating ureteral stone passage.