R. Thomas et al., ONE-STAGE LAPAROSCOPIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY AND RADICAL PERINEAL PROSTATECTOMY, The Journal of urology, 152(4), 1994, pp. 1174-1177
Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is currently an accepted pro
cedure for staging adenocarcinoma of the prostate. To assess the feasi
bility and efficacy of performing laparoscopic pelvic lymph node disse
ction and radical perineal prostatectomy during the same anesthesia, w
e retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with clinically localized adeno
carcinoma of the prostate who were candidates for radical prostatectom
y. Of the patients 12 (12%) underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node d
issection only since they had metastatic disease to the pelvic lymph n
odes on frozen section evaluation (the Gleason pathological grade was
2 to 4 in 2 patients, 5 to 7 in 8 and 8 in 2). Of the remaining 86 pat
ients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy for definitive mana
gement 76 (88%) underwent 1-stage radical perineal prostatectomy immed
iately after laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, while 10 (12%)
in the initial stages of our series underwent delayed perineal prosta
tectomy following laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (2-stage).
The average postoperative hospital stay in the 1-stage group was 3.11
days, yet 19 (25%) patients were discharged from the hospital within
48 hours and another 39 (51%) within 72 hours. Thus, 76% of the patien
ts were discharged from the hospital within 72 hours of laparoscopic p
elvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy. The ad
vent of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal
prostatectomy has found a resurgence at our institutions, with its lo
wer morbidity rate and more rapid return to normal activity for these
patients. Based on our results, we recommend laparoscopic pelvic lymph
node dissection followed by radical perineal prostatectomy as a 1-sta
ge treatment option for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.