BACKGROUND: The results of recent series suggest remarkable advantages
of laparoscopic appendectomy over the conventional open appendectomy.
To determine if clear advantages could be established, the charts of
all patients admitted to our institution with a presumptive diagnosis
of acute appendicitis and subsequent appendectomy were retrospectively
reviewed. STUDY DESIGN: From January 1990 through June 1992, there we
re 300 conventional open appendectomies and 66 laparoscopic appendecto
mies performed. Data from both groups were compared with respect to an
esthesia time, operative time, postoperative morbidity, postoperative
pain, time to regular diet, hospitalization period, cost, and return t
o normal activities. RESULTS: There were no significant differences be
tween the laparoscopic and open appendectomy groups with respect to op
erative complications, postoperative morbidity, pain medication requir
ements, and time to regular diet. There were significantly longer anes
thesia times, operative times, and operating room costs in the laparos
copic group. For complicated appendicitis, the laparoscopic technique
resulted in infectious complications that required readmission in 45.5
percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a
safe alternative to conventional open appendectomy for simple acute ap
pendicitis. However, laparoscopic appendectomy is not superior to the
conventional method with regard to operative time, postoperative morbi
dity, pain medication requirements, time to regular diet, length of st
ay, cost, or return to normal activity. Laparoscopic appendectomy may
be contraindicated in complicated appendicitis (gangrene, perforated w
ith abscess, or peritonitis) due to an increased rate of infectious co
mplications requiring readmission.