The glassforming region has been determined for the calcium galliosili
cate system. These glasses are less refractory than the corresponding
calcium aluminosilicate glasses and are more prone to phase separation
. The density, refractive index and thermal expansion coefficient are
higher than those of the corresponding aluminosilicate glass. In gener
al, differences between the properties of calcium galliosilicate and a
luminosilicate glasses can be explained on the basis of differences be
tween the mass and radius of the gallium and aluminium ions. However,
differences in behaviour between the galliosilicate and aluminosilicat
e glasses at low silica concentrations cannot be explained using the e
xisting model for the role of calcium in the structure of low silica g
lasses.